Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: LF: QSO format

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re[2]: LF: QSO format
From: "Ed Lesnichy" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:37:57 +0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Ed Lesnichy
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hello Ray & All!

Tuesday, December 17, 2002, 8:34:40 PM, you wrote:

Rcc> This format seems to be derived from the QSO format used in EME at 432 MHz
Rcc> and above. As an alternative, 144 MHz EME has dropped the use of T and M Rcc> reports, and uses only O which can only be sent to mean "I have copied both Rcc> callsigns."
The ending "K" to necessary... as against EME

Rcc> When both stations have exchanged callsigns, O and R (meaning Rcc> "roger" or "received"), the QSO is complete (73 is unnecessary). If signals Rcc> are especially strong, sometimes RST is substituted for O (as in 339, hi)
I agree with Ray's comments, if will be Very slow QRSS (30-120s dot) - Very slow
QRSS (or X-CW) QSO  - if callsing exchanged and both TX O(M,T) or R also - QSO
complete.

QSO Format #1 :
1) G3AQC K
2) AQC RU6LA K
3) LA M K
4) AQC MR (M & "Roger") K
5) R EE
6) EE

or QSO Format #2 (under sked):
1) G3AQC K
2) RU6LA K
3) LA M K    (or LA R K)
4) AQC MR K (or AQC R K)
5) R EE
6) EE

or QSO Format #3 (under sked):
1) G3AQC K
2) RU6LA K
3) MM K    (or M K  or R K)
4) MM RR K (or M K  or R K)
5) R EE
6) EE

6) EE - can be not necessary??

73! Ed  RU6LA  [email protected]




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>