To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Telephone wires |
From: | Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:46:08 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <004501c4ccbe$b4515c60$fad5fea9@smiley> |
References: | <000001c4ccbc$218c5760$6405a8c0@MJUSonyLaptop> <004501c4ccbe$b4515c60$fad5fea9@smiley> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
You might want to be quick though. I understand that the farmers are about to inundate the power and phone people with pole movement demands. - Stewart Tracey Gardner wrote: BT doesn't need a wayleave to have wires "flying" over your land, poles however are a different matter 73s Traceyneighbours telephone wires across my garden are an upcoming hazard formealso. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RE: Telephone wires, Tracey Gardner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: Telephone wires, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Telephone wires, Tracey Gardner |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Telephone wires, captbrian |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |