| | [email protected] wrote: 
 
  
  
  
  Pat, were we playing chess ? I didn't know that.... in any case I can
concede you not just one, nor two parsecsI think you now have me in a "Mate" situation and my only
defensive ploy is to try to influence the character of your theologian
of choice. He will of necessity be either a "believer", a "denier" or a
"doubter". Either way, I need time to figure out which one will benefit
my case. May I be allowed a parsec or two for my next move please?  :) but a countably infinite number of them. But don't forget that, being
the eternity, our ultimate destiny, a
 linear continuum, if you compute (aleph-nought / aleph-one) the result
is zero.....   :-)   (if Cantor was right)
 
 But you are certainly right, let's put these arguments to a rest, as
this is, after all, an LF discussion group !
 
 73  Alberto  I2PHD
 P.S. Isn't the parsec a measure of space and not of time ?
 
 
 | 
 |