Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals

from [WE0H Mike]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals
From:	WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:56:09 -0500
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Bingo, 'Ego Trip'.

Mike
WE0H
WD2XGI

[email protected] wrote:

Actually, that is not strictly true. If an experiment does not agree with theory then both the experiment and the theory need to be re-evaluated and both require validation and revue by a peer group. Unless such submissions are accepted as part of the due process then the exercise is pointless except as an ego trip!

g4gvw

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Andy LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Alberto di Bene LF: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals, captbrian LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Alberto di Bene Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Stewart Bryant Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Alexander S. Yurkov Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, G4gvw Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, WE0H Mike <=

Previous by Date:	LF: VE7TIL QSY 137778.3 QRSS60 K, Scott Tilley
Next by Date:	Re: LF: IRAQ, WE0H Mike
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, G4gvw
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: TX output circuit, copy wanted, Hans-Albrecht Haffa
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]