Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: RE: G3ldo's noise

from [Alberto di Bene] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: RE: G3ldo's noise
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:13:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <F5878FE035382745BF8928154A07D3D1938AB8@TNS-FBU-2E-006.corp.telenor.no>
References: <F5878FE035382745BF8928154A07D3D1938AB8@TNS-FBU-2E-006.corp.telenor.no>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
[email protected] wrote:
A bifilar wound choke passes the balanced signal, but attenuates the unbalanced. Propose to wind a 2x 1mH choke (possibly much less)

Wouldn't this play havoc with ADSL ?

73  Alberto  I2PHD

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: RE: G3ldo's noise, jan-martin . noding
Next by Date:  Re: LF: RE: G3ldo's noise, G4gvw
Previous by Thread:  LF: RE: G3ldo's noise, jan-martin . noding
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: RE: G3ldo's noise, G4gvw
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]