To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | AW: Re: AW: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:54:23 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1455728064; bh=DORIM5SQFWvMkt7eNF1FOgey1gLfKCJyRMtJ7QvpydI=; h=In-Reply-To:From:To:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-type; b=HIpMToD4PTk047DUQDWr7BCHrXglgR4jPHbvAO+nx0UxUrhh2h3jj2a/vB9Pj1DUq SxoR2IjFuAeH/NQ7FF+TB80PHEUedgosW/9gQhb4RvXWDZ3+591j2wNv/mMVNkB8A3 yWJcoqgFK/xE/cwMz4d1nCNoqdOKzyoKDciq0vVk= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
OK, Paul.
Stefan, it was neither GI nor Ni. you get some more opportunity: carrier is on. message: start 2016-02-17 18:00:00 same settings but:: repeat on hour until the wx gets too bad. Uwe/dj8wx Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> Gesendet: 17.02.2016 10:59 An: <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... Uwe wrote: > message follows at > 2016-02-1700 02:30:00 > same settings No problem, decoded with Eb/N0 = +6.7, a bit weaker thanks to the nighttime noise but would still do 10 second symbols. Stefan wrote: > Some decodes appeared but with 2 characters it could > be wrong. These are false decodes, just random noise which happens to have a correct CRC. The default list length of 20000 is too long for 2 chars, probably 1000 is enough. I'm still working on the difficult problem of finding the optimum list size and CRC strength for each message length. As you use longer list length, the chance of a decode increases (with rapidly diminishing benefit) but the chance of a false decode increases (roughly linearly). A false decode is more serious than a failed decode because there's no way to know if 'GT' or 'NI' was the correct message! At least with no decode, you know where you stand. So to make use of longer lists, it is necessary to send with stronger CRC, but the extra CRC bits is more inner code overhead which reduces the chance of a decode (for a fixed signal strength and duration). If CRC and list size are both increased by the right amounts, the decode chance overall increases, but only up to a limit corresponding to around 3dB coding gain from the outer code. The best settings could be determined by a lot of brute-force trials but the permutations to be tested are many and the computing time would be huge, so I try to reduce the number of trials by some performance calculations. For now, stay with 16 bit CRC and use list length 1000 or less for 2 chars. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: EADOM F4DTL QRSS3, F4DTL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: EbNaut on MF, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations..., Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations...DONE.., DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |