To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re. QRSS Proceedure |
From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:54:20 -0000 |
In-reply-to: | <001a01c07a49$2b7eb7a0$99ba883e@lvm> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the Qrss explanation,but why repeat T M or O ? Is this just to ensure that it gets through or is O O O more readable than O ? 73s Laurie. Well, normally the T, M or O is sent three times just to make sure it gets through. I had suggested that we could get away with sending it just twice for the transatlantic tests. Of course, if someone sends an O to you first, it should not be necessary to repeat, but the level of QSB may make repeats essential. In any case I am not trying to dictate, just to suggest an efficient approach. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.lf.thersgb.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Loading coil Q, Steve Rawlings |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: ARGO Build 113., Mike Dennison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re. QRSS Proceedure, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Loading coil Q, Steve Rawlings |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |