Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK etc. |
| From: | "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Jun 2000 13:28:47 +0200 |
| Organization: | Undisclosed |
| References: | <003e01bfcba6$70b54200$ac1886d4@kevin> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Kevin Ravenhill wrote : The general consensus of opinion seems to be that if you are going to use "machine" modes, BPSK has considerable superiority over any form of slow CW for the kind of very weak signals often encountered on the LF bands. When you say "machine" modes, are you meaning CW decoded by software or by the brain (be it aurally or visually) ? There is a profound difference... 73, Alberto I2PHD |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK etc., Talbot Andrew |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK etc., Paul Keinanen |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK etc., Kevin Ravenhill |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Slow CW, BPSK, machine modes, M. Bruno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |