Thanks all for your responses.
I still recall my activity on 136kHz some 13 yrs ago, therefore I was a bit
disappointed now.
Obviously, I will have to stay overnight in my distant and rough QTH next
time!
73, Petr, OK1FIG
-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Staubach
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 15:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Listened on 472 kHz
Petr,
the activity in CW could be better, no doubt. But there are also active
evenings. For example yesterday around 19UTC:
- G3KEV wkd DF8ND
- DF8ND CQ, but no response on DJ2LF call, QSB
- OK2BVG CQ, but no response on DJ2LF call, QSB
- HB9ASB strong, wkg QSX 35xx
- DJ2LF wkd G3KEV
WSPR can be interesting, but I prefer regular QSO's.
Indeed, after sunset and the night will be the best time for working.
And what about transmitting?
Maybe we all should do like this:
Some CQ-calls a day keep frustration away
(Hopefully) ;-)
73
Walter DJ2LF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Maly" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 9:28 AM
Subject: LF: Listened on 472 kHz
Hello all,
I can reasonably listen to LF/MF only in my /P QTH. After long long time I
could spend almost the whole Saturday by listening on 472 kHz. The only
station heard was DL2HRE, see the screenshot. I haven't heard any one
else,
and no QSO. I believe the conditions would allow the standard two-way CW
QSOs easily.
Is the current traffic on 472 kHz really that low? Are you all on WSPR? Is
the activity now splitted amongst 136, 472 and 505 kHz? Should I listen
after sunset instead? Is the number of countries with 472 kHz permitted
for
all still low?
73, Petr, OK1FIG
Ico1123553.JPG
Description: JPEG image
|
