Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: SAQ statistics |
| From: | "Chris" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:30:47 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1468434650; bh=KtgRhzFZ16IrCxxpsJwSjwTPZMcR13wvvCTKYHIY3Qs=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=lyPUuimntu47+p+TMWCepAtX2pX0wqiZWKUS/4AZCjPCFML/0nZvlg2sTC476Zs1qnfbYm6TLk3JeQ0yw1FIe5sLvZSf88rCHoG/cWUD37qpWXWDqc7nE4q4JnDUXUb37qJVnIUTf9//RJAdsnGCd8nwhnWQloLWJ0qa5S0WbhE= |
| References: | <178286273.1256395.1468404155372.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Probably because it's so easy and we've done it many times before? G4AYT.----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics Hi, On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:... Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116 ?Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK receiving SAQ ? Peter PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: SAQ statistics, Peter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: SAQ statistics, Andy Talbot |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: SAQ statistics, Peter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: SAQ statistics, Andy Talbot |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |