LF: Re: Emails not in sequence

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: Emails not in sequence
From:	[email protected]
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2001 11:31:59 EDT
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Hi John,

> I noticed that the emails re: GBR were very badly out of order.
> In some cases in reverse order.

Same happens here (with ISP=AOL) sometimes. I often experience this:
After disconnecting from the ISP and re-connecting, there are suddenly 3 or
more new incoming mails. As I don't know anything how and where the mails are
stored & forewarded, I can only guess it's a 'temporary net overloading
effect'.
Anyway, no problem if some "Re's" arrive before the original message.

73, Wolf, DL4YHF.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: Emails not in sequence, DL4YHF <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: 73/136 khz, John Currie
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 73/136 khz, g3ldo
Previous by Thread:	LF: Filed effect versus bipolar transistors, Dick Rollema
Next by Thread:	RE: LF: Field effect versus bipolar tran sistors, Talbot Andrew
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]