Hello all,
Stefan is not the only one in 9kHz. But he is actually the most successful
experimenter.
The question about a valid "QSO" seemi to me some academic. If we think about
DXCC we've got to keep in mind, that 9kHz is not a HAM band and in DL even
500kHz is not. Even a crossband QSO would be not valid. And by law a QSO
between a german HAM station and a german DI station would be illegal. Of
course that is is perfect bullshit - but the official version of DARC and
others I call "Vereinsfunker".
Horst
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: "Johan H. Bodin" <jh.bodin@telia.com>
Gesendet: 30.03.2010 06:17:30
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?
>Mike Dennison wrote:
>[...]
>> The first is to know for certain that the station you are listening
>> to cannot be someone else (or something else). In this case a single
>> letter (either pre-arranged or part of the callsign) should be
>> adequate.
>
>Yes, of course. It important to remember that 9kHz is still "the lonely
>dreamer's band". Pile-ups and other "traffic jams" are still quite rare
>(!) so the risk of misreading a callsign is minimal. There are about
>three million licenced radio amateurs on the regulated ham bands. On
>9kHz there is currently one (Stefan), and he has the privilege to choose
>his own callsign, operating procedures etc. without breaking any law.
>
>73
>Johan SM6LKM
>
>
___________________________________________________________
WEB.DE DSL: Internet, Telefon und Entertainment für nur 19,99 EUR/mtl.!
http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
|
