To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: ZM2E LF DX aspirations |
From: | Richard Rogers <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:42:02 +1100 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:42:40 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <000001c5c7f2$322a1940$8701a8c0@IBMF7542B482FC> |
References: | <17879303.1126259836649.JavaMail.www@wwinf3201> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
G'day all, I saw a trace on 137.7876KHz (+/- .5Hz?) from about 0820z to 0840z on 4 Oct 05. Active vertical, suburbia Hobart, sunset 0819z. At 09:08 PM 10/3/05 +1300, you wrote:  Hi all, sunset and sunrise sequence is as follows: and thepath becomes dark to VA7LF 1417 UTC VA7LF sunrise, so nearly 8 hours of dark path to ZL (path is mostly north/south) 1453 UTC RU6LA sunset andthe path becomes darl to ZL 1754 UTC ZL sunrise, so only 3 hours of dark path with RU6LA (path is mostly east/west) This means that third party monitoring could see what they get from any or all particpants, and as a compromise it may be best to set 60 second dot length as that is more likely to be the QSO attempt rate than 120 seconds(the sun comes up too soon!). 73, Bob ZL2CA 73, Ric, VK7RO |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: Advice (again) please - Driving FETs, OSBORN, Chris |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: ZM2E LF DX, chastant |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: ZM2E LF DX aspirations, Jay Rusgrove |
Next by Thread: | LF: ZM2E LF DX aspirations, Lawrence Mayhead G3AQC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |