Re: LF: CFH? Dumb Question

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: CFH? Dumb Question
From:	"Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:28:24
In-reply-to:	<010401c15cd3$cafcbb20$628fc9c8@P800>
References:	<B7FC83E7.19E8%[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Hello Marcus,

It probably is the Canadian Navy station CFH. It runs rather high power (I
believe 10-100kW in the past), so expect any VE ham signals to be at least
40-50dB weaker.

From my experience last winter the VE ham QRSS or DFCW signals can be

copied when CFH is at least coming in with 30dB SNR.

73, Rik  ON7YD

At 19:34 24/10/01 -0200, you wrote:

Hi ...

What this carrier is? An amateur signal or an utility station? Is the freq
exactly 137KHz?

73
Marcus, PY3CRX/PY2PLL
GG66rf
http://py.qsl.br
Active from "DC" to 24GHz

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: CFH?, (continued) LF: Re: CFH?, Larry Kayser Re: LF: CFH?, jannsen Re: LF: CFH?, 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW Re: LF: CFH?, jannsen Re: Re: LF: CFH?, Ko Versteeg LF: CFH?, Dave Sergeant LF: Re: CFH?, John Andrews Re: LF: CFH?, Mitch Powell LF: CFH? Dumb Question, PY3CRX PY2PLL Re: LF: CFH? Dumb Question, Mitch Powell Re: LF: CFH? Dumb Question, Rik Strobbe <= Re: LF: CFH? Dumb Question, PY3CRX PY2PLL

Previous by Date:	LF: Bearing on signal, Brian Rogerson
Next by Date:	LF: CFH?not so Dumb Question, Talbot Andrew
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: CFH? Dumb Question, Mitch Powell
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: CFH? Dumb Question, PY3CRX PY2PLL
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]