Re: LF: Re LF Beacon signals

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re LF Beacon signals
From:	"Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:09:00
In-reply-to:	<001001c08794$b935e340$b6ab883e@lvm>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Hi Laurie,

The other thing is what about a Loop Rx ant.? that should give a few dbsimprovement in S/N due to directivity.


A loop can be very efficient to null out one source of QRM/QRN, due to the
very sharp minimum. Further is is rather insensitive to local electric

field QRN, provided the shielding is good.But the maximum of a loop is very broad so I'm afraid it won't give any

improvement in regard with atmospheric QRN.

Maybe a phased array improve SNR due to directivity, at least for those who
have the space and a several 100m of coax.

73, Rik  ON7YD

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re LF Beacon signals, LAWRENCE MAYHEAD Re: LF: Re LF Beacon signals, Rik Strobbe <= LF: Time efficient code, Rik Strobbe LF: Re: Time efficient code, Steve Olney Re: LF: Re LF Beacon signals, john sexton

Previous by Date:	LF: RE: RE: VA3LK seen in ON, Talbot Andrew
Next by Date:	LF: Time efficient code, Rik Strobbe
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re LF Beacon signals, LAWRENCE MAYHEAD
Next by Thread:	LF: Time efficient code, Rik Strobbe
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]