Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Bandplanning: QRS frequencies .... |
| From: | "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Jul 1999 09:59:28 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
At 10:06 10/07/99 +0100, G3WKL wrote: You may also prefer that we adopt the narrower the high-frequency allocation, that is 137.65kHz to 137.75kHz. As long as traffic on 136kHz is at the actual level I prefer 137.6 - 137.8 for slow-CW. Although almost all activity is located arround 137.7 the lower 'border' (137.6) makes it easier to filter out strong 'normal-CW'. Regarding the upper 'border' I think that 137.75 only will create a 50Hz 'waste'. Besides that some hams (eg. IK1ODO) used to operate arround 137.78kHz 73, Rik Rik Strobbe ON7YD [email protected] Villadreef 14 B-3128 Baal BELGIUM (JO20IX) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: First QSO on 136 kHz from OK!!!, OK1FIG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: weekend report 9-11 july 1999, Rik Strobbe |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Bandplanning: QRS frequencies ...., John W Gould |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Bandplanning: QRS frequencies ...., Toni Baertschi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |