Re: LF: 137 grabbers

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: 137 grabbers
From:	Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:03:02 +0200
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:importance:x-mailer :x-mimeole; bh=DXzC2WTmVIFU3vJGAhsPYv4MdnDKA/rVEW0CIBpwq9Q=; b=seN79gdupClUDMjnPAVjCSwaRFP7H6Kg+kfoWkieu2IJvrSqC6wRmV0LWgbJ1TiA9T PNytPa0OnmkTLXRG8G2YAa0yNt+DOTnOEOij5K4bj61ufrlkHli/dCd+cVjwcu6DZIrL fFHLHD7E+HKJUxI6wDetSKKc80LtV2ErxIn0w=
Importance:	Normal
In-reply-to:	<002601cc5a9a$020d6f00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References:	<002601cc5a9a$020d6f00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Mal, LF,

I am now using a single-turn loop in the backyard (hight abt 2 meters) instead of the miniwhip.
One of these days I will test again with the miniwhip. First impression (testing the noise against DCF39) was that they dont differ very much.

73’s Minto pa3bca (grabber at http://pa3bca.pa3bca.nl:8181)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse

From: mal hamilton

Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 17:51

To: rsgb

Subject: LF: 137 grabbers

My signal seems consistant on the PA3PCA grabber but varies a lot on the DK7FC grabber, sometimes stronger on this grabber and others like now barely visible. Could it be the type of antenna in use ie one is more prone to noise es qsb than the other?

mal/g3kev

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: 137 grabbers, mal hamilton Re: LF: 137 grabbers, Minto Witteveen <=

Previous by Date:	LF: 137 grabbers, mal hamilton
Next by Date:	LF: Re: 137 grabbers, Minto Witteveen
Previous by Thread:	LF: 137 grabbers, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: 137 grabbers, Minto Witteveen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]