Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: 136kHz ferrite rod antenna test

To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: 136kHz ferrite rod antenna test
From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:51:41 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1314121857; bh=OJi3ZaquwpCwPSXLYoMSULEJ0HZCpcs7Ym2/bEOwAPU=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=PHebJOwWSmxJsMbk6E9ms5KDpUu+pvQI3AJQYFLr9Q9r3yB70rpWZztWQxuFMRKgytTbgBzRpNH09B91ysx8W98Pyzd+b9Nj+NTYCMYflqtb2rPkYuvNBLbgDrqFhk1BYvx3VZtOUX4xYPsykHYujxRiMIrq2vXopGyyF0IusNo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=r80dc2YYeIx+2oykBzt7VHPRXx/dXmCdXRjR8D+P9ofoOFEokhmrD4jKIWjFQDKnIZCK507jk1j0bivhGK/fWe84RKam8BAwmt71e6IBmi5x3hVGlXTxNfYzY1QeFJQDMA9IRfoUCTys7go6zSYln7K9mj3aSRCCzgoPVrOA0kg= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Dear LF Group,

Having said quite a lot about ferrite rods on the reflector recently, I thought I better try one as a quick "feasibility study"!
I have a large bar of ferrite I had assembled from surplus "U" cores some 
years ago as part of a portable SAQ receiving system (it's a long story...). 
The"rod" is about 470mm long, with rectangular cross section about 30mm x 
35mm. This is rather larger than the rods used by DK7FC and DF6NM, but the 
ferrite is more lossy - probably 3C8 or some similar "power" grade. 30 turns 
of litz wire gave L about 360uH and Q of 150 (so using litz probably wasn't 
justified, but I had that length to hand). This resonates with about 3700pF 
at 137kHz, giving an equivalent parallel resistance of about 45kohm and a 
bandwidth a bit under 1kHz.
The preamp is a compound JFET/bipolar follower using a J310 biased to 6mA 
and a 2N3053 biased to 50mA (probably similar performance to a "mini-whip" 
preamp at 137k). The high Z input is connected directly across the tuned 
antenna winding. With the high QRN on the band this evening, it is hard to 
get a good view of the noise floor, so I used a "dummy antenna" consisting 
of a pot-core inductor wound with the same inductance and Q, substituted for 
the real rod antenna to simulate a zero signal and external noise condition. 
The noise output from the resonated dummy antenna was 10dB or more above the 
RX noise floor (SDR-IQ). The preamp with input shorted gave a noise level 
below the RX noise floor. So this preamp arrangement gives sensitivity 
limited by the thermal noise of the antenna, and adequate gain for the 
"reasonably good sensitivity" SDR-IQ (also for my RA1792).
I made a rough estimate of the overall sensitivity of the complete system by 
measuring the level of DCF39, which is a fairly stable 800uV/m here during 
daylight. On an arbitrary scale on the SDR-IQ spectrogram, DCF39 was -19dB, 
while the noise floor at around 137.7kHz with dummy antenna was -109dB with 
0.75Hz FFT noise bandwidth. This works out to an antenna noise floor of 
about 0.03uV/m per sqrt(Hz), several dB below quiet 136kHz band conditions. 
So sensitivity of a receive system with this antenna should be limited only 
by the band noise; it should also be possible to reduce the amount of 
ferrite somewhat, especially if lower loss ferrite antenna rods are used. I 
await lower QRN levels for a "live" test !
Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>