Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Earth electrode antennas

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Earth electrode antennas
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 15:04:34 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=hGoRlM1WnVnD8YVGcu9vuBTTZNal0ZjmMjfGHqAY/6s=; b=MQTX/2yCtnSyLKt8hbbKCoc1NiKV4EtVVHjgHc/p1PU1gils6y4F+V3YOPG8w9Q0wN Rxjb1irAwW5+EPQNbrTLSRFljC81V6qvPItnOG4xG40iVUrfblCNR+voVLEF0+wRlZI3 hzgB7zLsGQhXtQh/a4bkeIx0wd23qgC5Ang/2/FLK0eEzCnUqiB+CYfiwSuibDs7Cucj UuBu1srotg0oX0glwovaRarMUwHbhOxwdy212eo45gwY50wfcTZcIxQ3LcbLK2XMWm5+ hXHYaHFX1QYpZulD1N1vDTIcIkFzCzqMIxEYUqJt+3PYAn3u6zER0zFxOpeH61SPTmLn mAdg==
In-reply-to: <002c01cd5760$1d2a22b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <[email protected]> <628FB34D9D1741F2AB02D0ECEB380F01@64683d74b6134b3> <002c01cd5760$1d2a22b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
My (just) 20m spaced earth electrode antenna got plenty of WSPR reports with around 1mW ERP on 500kHz Mal with my best DX report received from 418km. Even on 136kHz my 10-20uW ERP QRSS3 signal got over 100km with this same antenna. On VLF it allowed me to copy DK7FC/P from his kite on 8.97kHz on my first try. He was much better on my 80m square loop though, which was erected later. 

My 500kHz measurements suggested it was only about 8dB down on my 80m sq vertical loop that worked pretty well. 

Summary: earth electrode antennas are not as good as a well elevated Marconi or loop, but work surprisingly well considering how simple they are to excite and match. 

73s
Roger G3XBM

-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --

On 1 Jul 2012, at 09:04, "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote:

Someone forgot to mention the 1 K/watt pumped into this antenna, no good for QRP merchants.
I tried this method years ago on a hotel flat roof in Hongkong and although I did work a few stations it was a POOR performer compared to the same dipole elevated --- big difference
I was running about 100 Watts to the dipole
There is no substitute for an Antenna being elevated into the air as high as possible except short range high angle communications is required, then a low dipole has an advantage.
 
 
de mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 8:40 PM
Subject: LF: Re: MF dipole


 That means, for a MF dipole test i would start to try to lay it
> on the ground. If this works with reasonable efficiency, so that a QSO
> is possible, it would be a simple solution for a quick /p MF antenna
> that can find its place in a back pack!
>

Like K3MT's Grasswire antenna?.

73 Robert
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>