To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz |
From: | Chris Osborn <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:17:34 +0000 (UTC) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1420291055; bh=NcJyQfY+n9W6J1n6xnJJQYavKCXi9J//zeqFJc+TcOA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=ofDMSlSlaF/VUt61GY6/EpyKndAOUDGZNkYIFtxmePbFxKqpyvyWSCJtDS4L4FZVEWz06QacJHV+BaPTUFJW9v7pqGN/AfCWdFI3kRoO7c2xp3YG6zcptVLeXq035OpzWiAlNa+peIUeDOIG+BGvJ0/PKybz3fsqxHGIZjCxT2K/pSwJ6OqeflyGgszxyFL7Mopp7I9PA557qQckEjFgJ2iEryB2fvefGue78sX/sLMgCSYBQWA3Hyoz/Fg19eQV+qyIRrMprUY1D6V2sQS3LySXVLn0DghmR8i+cy6F9Ic85t5Kw8Dy0x+A7tBDHmQ6CjrMXF0bUtsW7nS8TmOiBA== |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.co.uk; b=BXcbQa4+G7gCneVIVVgQYZGgXYgwTjKplZEhp7Wb3xKIKAec916QEizhbWECwdwXio7uIhc5ti5pA05In9aAsh9KmUIPCh5LYutura+HBhTFepcnvku7tTWf3oAqxtbAI9HoTlY9fOh2WMb4GfH3C/3OeQWHG8hctmL9JZGiTeQheRClfmh6kO5YIpHKuAlgID4DSyfSLn/XIGyCsU4ZYW36FOdop2EY9wl9nV0/zGf3avRt5iw3TnaSSbtqjCl2fg2RdJNhJXvVM2OGIvVVWMcoyHJfMmRdGJfhqm/58JrQkbopTsHd/oYOk9dI3M/7ZKRaPBkIwX4JCV7gf6rrSw==; |
In-reply-to: | <F77D7A683C7E433488571FFE1645018F@White> |
References: | <F77D7A683C7E433488571FFE1645018F@White> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks again Joe and Markus for the great screen shots. I'm trying 137.635 kHz now to clear that QRM. I'm just looking at my old LF logbook of ten years ago - January 2005 (in date order) There was a lot of activity then, both on CW and QRSS: OH5UFO PA0BWL F6CWA OK2BVG DF0WD M0FMT YU7AR G3XDV M0BMU F6BWO HA6PC DL2HRE Z38AV G3YXM SM6BHZ DF6NM G3AQC S57A HF7VPM IK5ZPV G3OLB DK1IS G3WCB G3LDO F6CHT Happy days. 73 Chris G3XIZ On Saturday, 3 January 2015, 12:51, Markus Vester <[email protected]> wrote: Chris,
very nice! Here's your last over, with the NB
switched off after the first quarter. You're nicely put in the middle of
the gap now. There seems to be a weak QRM line exactly on 630, so finetuning up
or down by a couple of Hz would help even more.
73, Markus
Many thanks Marcus for the useful screen
shot.
My next few transmissions will
be on 137.63 kHz to clear your QRM.
73
Chris
On Saturday, 3 January 2015, 12:14, Markus
Vester <[email protected]>
wrote: Hi Chris,
also well readable in Nuernberg JN59NJ.
Unfortunately DCF39 bursts are big here, attached screenshot is
without noise blanking. Normally I have the SpecLab blanker
engaged with short (1.5 ms) ramps, which reduces the splatter but also
tends to render the signal a bit choppy. Note that there is a clear
frequency range around the null in the splatter spectrum at 137.63
kHz.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
From: Chris
Osborn
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz Many thanks for the report Joe.
It's lashing down
with rain here and the aerial current is low so I'm pleased to be getting
out.
73
Chris
On Saturday, 3 January 2015, 11:36, Joe
<[email protected]> wrote: Hi
Chris,
and
again…
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Chris
Osborn Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Januar 2015 12:13 An: LF Group Betreff: LF: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz HNY LF, I'll be QRV on 137.7 using QRSS / DFCW for the next hour
or so. Reports / QSO's welcome. Anyone (within range) who'd like a QSO / sked please let
me know. Set up: 120 watts RF, inverted 'L' 43m @
9m 73 Chris
G3XIZ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz, Chris Osborn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz, Chris Osborn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |