Pete re not getting your postings back from Blacksheep......have you checked
in the Spam folder in your webmail?? Yahoo regards mail sent to self as spam
!!
Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message -----
From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
Hi all
I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as
perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much higher than
elsewhere.
Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to SM no doubt
contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been consistently large
over many years.
It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but don't report
in.... a bit unlikely.
Many thanks for the suggestions.
Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47
And
because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from
that by now.Been there, done that
Andy G4JNT
On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,
Chris <[email protected]>
wrote:
Probably
because it's so easy and we've done it many times
before?
G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
Hi,
On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:
...
Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116
?
Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK
receiving SAQ ?
Peter
PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav
|
