To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: If anyones about , MT63 x 500 Hz and Olivia 500 x 8 running now 1935 hrs |
From: | John P-G <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:14:33 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <496EB18A0C4445438D91F6DC7C55C4FD@AGB> |
References: | <01eb01c9832c$74945e50$a402a8c0@Inspiron> <[email protected]> <AD8469FDDC2A4CE1A2AD0DA3753E415C@JimPC> <000f01c983b5$cfe04330$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <20090131200626.39efb3dc@lurcher> <071798B2D2F8408E9570FC11F569524C@AGB> <20090204200049.5cb8ccba@lurcher> <496EB18A0C4445438D91F6DC7C55C4FD@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Graham, LF, I've got 2 copies of Multipsk running, as you described earlier, on 501.00 dial frequ. I get the occasional "CQ" and "nbd" in the gibberish on the Olivia version, and nothing at all on the MT63 version. I have heard the odd "two tone warble" that marks the start of an Olivia transmission very, very faintly, but no real sign of the FSK during the actual message. Let's see what the QSB does... John On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:06:00 -0000 "Graham" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > If you set up multipsk on the 2 streams may print from under the > noise .. its a follow on from the other night with Gary , where I > could not turn the power down low enough to stop mt63 from > printing .. less than 1 watt single tone .. just barely showing on > the waterfall ... but mt63 is supposed to be 10 db less effective > that mfsk .. that's a lot ! > > G .. |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: If anyones about , MT63 x 500 Hz and Olivia 500 x 8 running now 1935 hrs, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: If anyones about , MT63 x 500 Hz and Olivia 500 x8running now 1935 hrs, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: If anyones about , MT63 x 500 Hz and Olivia 500 x 8 running now 1935 hrs, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: If anyones about , MT63 x 500 Hz and Olivia 500 x 8 running now 1935 hrs, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |