To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: TU in Morse |
From: | brian hodgson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 30 May 2006 21:31:15 +0100 (BST) |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=W09ZvnEcn9p31DKK0YcViv8pJl799u2CWhbGs0EcejEGrxsCvRGo2NGQUGo6gGw34xcW9fZ12tmyUj0WKUD/hWZQugHC9ctPVFHlo2f9jGXhXdGfvcCRZ7C1vCV9iQ8gO2oRRE6PBbAKqb6zAN6Hijvg+Ih6iLxJV7ITP96zqc4= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (test mode) |
In-reply-to: | <447C9379.11105.E56D34@localhost> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
TU certainly had me confused when I first started receiving on 136. When I was using RTTY in the 70's and 80's, TU and its longer version BTU meant "To You" and "Back To You". Have not used RTTY for many years so don't know whether it is still in use. TU means "thank you" and is more efficient (particularly in QRSS)
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" � The Wall Street Journal |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Andy's beacon active again, Alan Melia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: how to do? (2), riese-k3djc |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: TU in Morse, John RABSON |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: TU in Morse, Marek SQ5BPM |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |