Re: LF: Info's...

["john sexton" <computernetworks@excite.com>]

 Hi Wolf,
Thanks for making the effort to complete a QSO with me on saturday.
When you returned QRZ I understood that 3 second dots would not work and went to 10 seconds, with success.
It takes a long time and requires patience, hence I kept the overs as short as possible. Nevertheless I was able to prepare and eat breakfast during the course of the QSO.
I have been and continue to send QRSS10 CQs in the hope that others will make the effort. Everyone piles in when there is a strong station around like RU6LWZ, but it requires more of an effort and a good receive set-up to winkle out the weak ones.

Hi Szigy,
As reported last week, I have seen your QRSS3 sigs here in England. Very readable but slightly broken so M/O.
If you are not getting responses it is more down to the poor receivers around than your sigs.

73 and good luck John, G4CNN


--- On Sun 04/07,

wrote:
> Hello Szigy and group,
>
> Thanks for your info.
> Have you been transmitting on late saturday evening ? There was a quite
> weak
> trace on the waterfall, but I am not too sure if it was you calling
> someone
> or someone calling you.
>
> The signal from RU6LWZ / RU6LA was clearly visible here in northern DL,
> but
> not as strong as on the previous weekend. Many stations called RU6, as
> seen
> on the cluster spots relayed by Alan. The weaker ones (like myself at
> DF0WD)
> didn't make it through, condx didnt help this time. So looking forward for
>
> more activity from the East ;-)
>
> -...-
>
> About non-responded emails: I'm not sure about the AB6QV gateway (tried to
>
> use it some years ago) - is it possible that it rejects email addresses
> which
> don't look like amateur radio calls ?
>
> -...-
>
> Congrats to all who made it into RU6LWZ's logbook, and thanks to John
> G4CNN
> for your patience to make it into DF0WD's lookbook. There were static
> crashes
> here making the AGC jump, cutting many 'dashes' into 'dots'.
>
> Regards,
> Wolf DL4YHF.
>
>

---