| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: here no results from DK7FC's 8th experiment |
| From: | "Horst Stöcker" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:46:56 +0200 (CEST) |
| Importance: | normal |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <1237369649.1611432.1287678227104.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb077> <[email protected]> <op.vkxspwijyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <979620351.2557914.1287853881158.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb077>, <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Sensitivity: | Normal |
|
Hello Daniele, the broadband capture is missing. In the attachment I just found two usr files that I will try after receiving SAQ this morning. Possibly it's just one single noise source here at the QTH. I know this problem at my preferred portable QTH for UHF: When I first tried to receive natural radio at this site some years ago there was more (audible!) noise than here at home. I tried almost any VLF dedicatet usr file that I could find in SpecLab and here in the reflector. I had all alphas well visible. I bet it's a local noise problem that possibly cant'be fixed. The Mini Whip is a big step forward indeed comparing with my T-Marconi fed directly into the soundcard, into my MV-62 selective level meter and into my homebrew preamp with band pass. I am looking forward to your broadband capture. vy73 Horst DO1KHS/DI2AN
|
| Previous by Date: | LF: VLF, Lubos OK2BVG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, victor13 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: here no results from DK7FC's 8th experiment, Daniele Tincani |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: here no results from DK7FC's 8th experiment, Paul-Henrik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |