To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: new ?? |
From: | Ed Lesnichy <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:32:19 +0400 |
In-reply-to: | <425BCF3E.11650.17B7688@localhost> |
Organization: | Ed Lesnichy |
References: | <000701c53f43$2e3dd4d0$5f4136d2@mcalevey> <425BCF3E.11650.17B7688@localhost> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
LF enthusiasts, such signal is better for visual identification of weak signals 4(dash)/2(dot) or 6/2 or 6/3 for vertical pixels I have written the call one known LF enthusiast and that could RX other known LF enthusiast ;-) 73! Ed RU6LA [email protected] http://136.73.ru |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re. G3AQC in ZL, John Andrews |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Re: Re. G3AQC in ZL, Laurence KL1X |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: How to easily cross the Pond ? (was : G3AQC in ZL), Alberto di Bene |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G3AQC in ZL, Joe Craig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |