-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht (HTML) wurde als Anlage beigefügt.-----
Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: 19.08.04 11:00:25
An: "Hans-Albrecht Haffa"
Betreff: Re: LF: QRSS origin
Dear Lowfers,
isnt it nice to follow this long discussion about the origin of the short term QRSS? It must be that many of us had a good course of Latin at grammar school. To add my comment:
NVLLI PARVVS EST CENSVS CVI MAGNVS ANIMVS EST...
SI TACVISSES PHILOSOPHVS MANSISSES.
I started with Gram, then ARGO now Spectro Lab.
Please do not forget Our Long Wave Activity Day at 18. /19 September 2004.
55,
Hans-Albrecht
DK 8 ND
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht wurde als Attachment angehängt.-----
[email protected] wrote: I think you now have me in a "Mate" situation and my only defensive ploy is to try to influence the character of your theologian of choice. He will of necessity be either a "believer", a "denier" or a "doubter". Either way, I need time to figure out which one will benefit my case. May I be allowed a parsec or two for my next move please? :) Pat, were we playing chess ? I didn't know that.... in any case I can concede you not just one, nor two parsecs but a countably infinite number of them. But don't forget that, being the eternity, our ultimate destiny, a linear continuum, if you compute (aleph-nought / aleph-one) the result is zero..... :-) (if Cantor was right) But you are certainly right, let's put these arguments to a rest, as this is, after all, an LF discussion group ! 73 Alberto I2PHD P.S. Isn't the parsec a measure of space and not of time ?
|