To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:34:22 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1492184063; bh=f26F66e9LH6iXqHNSdXximxjqBn2If9I4nFij7/ow/A=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D234fIV4uCaUCF5bH/tjiJ/xyxlIdiag3THHxR5u6nxUgEFsLj1gciCJjwZHTlRTN RQ7kftIOzOLLegL0VCHX9oXu/mraMa2QqHD7a2fBN06isVXsj6nZWbFTB8qGO1wiBx 5ILX03mphkG5VVjCMBjkHIbP3k7Fs65uPIZFHy9Y= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks Paul! Yes I intend to leave it on for a while. I wonder if you could measure the relative phase of Stefan's and my daytime carriers? Although the frequencies are different, the phases are referenced to a common timeframe (midnight UT). We have been discussing whether we could transit simultaneously on the same QRG with appropriately aligned TX phase, increasing the combined signal by ~2 dB. 73, Markus -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Fr, 14. Apr 2017 17:14 Betreff: Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz Markus wrote: > since 13:30 I'm running a carrier on 6469.9975 Hz with 0.21 A. Looks to be about 0.06 fT here, but not significant against the noise floor in one hour integration. If you can run for 3 hours it could show up well. For comparison, Stefan's (nighttime) 6470 signal is about 0.18 fT. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] VO1NA 477 OP8 :Start 2300 finish 0900 50 watts to monopole., jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 136 OP32 last 24 Hr, Chris Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |