To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | VLF: India 16.3 kHz long path |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 15 May 2016 14:55:38 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1463338539; bh=XMHOONoA2WPsfrNla6LJTqIFVnFPYu8vbImjLEDM+h0=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yUgc1/77J/+LqY1j/sXDwYLUy6n/kvKu9YWui0nwU5zuHDbVYE3wCrpgS8TUbzBzp t8vIwFATOYd4/+ic/9FUG8ODPDC9emDVX+YyQeh8CGbUxhmZ1Q/KPd2Ehix+S51+NH efn8gzh1mZZvhZL/VaZ+ExYwLjWg0qTODidWMetw= |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Moving the zoomed section of my VLF wideband spectrogram to 16.3 kHz, I noticed the familiar interference stripes from the superposition of short and long path signals. The periodicity is about 11.8 Hz here, corresponding to 25.4 megameters path difference (7.3 Mm direct vs. 32.7 Mm long path). The same effect is visible every day on 19.8 kHz, NWC from Australia (12 vs. 28 Mm).
Best 73, Markus (DF6NM)
vtx1_160515_2x.png |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done!, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | LF: May 14-15 Best QRB/reports, Alex R7NT |
Next by Thread: | LF: qrv 472.5, Dr. Wolf Ostwald |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |