Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz
From:	Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 05:59:19 -0400
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1459504760; bh=YlMfnwpijPK5ZKn7JQG9IzwZz3wz8RkjwB6I8bGnipY=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FBWTAprA0fOGr6YAJJugY6EzwsZWyGg64LG5crr3MmGtlMprA8/RCTGBQB3pmS1rr zK9YMSbdBhDS5+2cEoZqFXGBxXD+g4AwomPu3UrPdBAIM3mf52IRsfppnhEpjCNHmQ Ih2HelF/9WYkNgJolz/nsp/xOy6ibW04wF1uTTNM=
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Uwe,

unfortunately static level was high, preventing your carriers before and after the PSK from showing up in my spectrogram. The EbNaut decoder produced "GL" at rank 13429 and -1 dB Eb/N0, but I have no clue whether this message is really correct.

Best 73,

Markus

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Do, 31 Mrz 2016 9:23 pm
Betreff: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz

Thanks Uwe. The late evening may not be ideal in terms of QRN background but let's try anyway. I have pushed out the antenna again (half height due to wind), and restarted the VLF grabbers with EbNaut recording since19 UT. 8270.000 is still within EbNaut's bandwidth (+-1/40 Hz) of your QRG so I hope that my new VLF neighbour Roland won't fire up tonight.

All the best,

Markus (DF6NM)

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: uwe-jannsen <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Do, 31 Mrz 2016 6:38 pm
Betreff: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz

the carrier is on the air.
there will be a special message for Markus:

start 22:00:00

coding 8K19A

CRC 16

period 40

length 2

duration 04:05:20:00

Have fun
Uwe/dj8wx

PS. rain would stop the transmission automatically.

Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Gesendet: 24.03.2016 00:00
An: <[email protected]>
Betreff: VLF: 8270 March 22

Yesterday afternoon the noise was fairly moderate, and around 18 UT I caught a good dash in 63 uHz, presumably from DJ8WX. I then attempted simulated EbNaut decodes on the carrier, using 1 and 2 character settings and 40 s symbols. Both resulted in valid asterisk messages, with some more margin to spare for the single character. So far I have never decoded a real message on VLF, and I'd be keen to try...

Best 73,

Markus (DF6NM)

04010012_result.png
Description: PNG image

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Markus Vester <= AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Paul Nicholson Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, DK7FC Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, DK7FC AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Paul Nicholson AW: Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Markus Vester AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Paul Nicholson

Previous by Date:	*RE: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz - 410=160*, Markus Vester*
Next by Date:	AW: Re: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen
Previous by Thread:	*RE: AW: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz - 410=160*, Markus Vester*
Next by Thread:	AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]