Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:18:58 +0000
Accept-language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FD98944@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AdKiaIBIO5o0hwscS6u6Fr35fDFuJQAGaHpMAAHrrfsAAGM6cgAUGoUuAANVBVAAAHWbDv//9RwAgAAVcAv///UrgIAAMM5n
Thread-topic: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF

Hi Stefan,


I am afraid I touched a sensitive spot ;-)

I can only ensure you that is certainly not my intention to blame anyone.

I have done some WSPRing last winter and below 2000km distance propagation seems te be pretty contstant during darkness. There is the deep QSB, typical for the 500kHz range, but on avege there is little difference during the night.

The discrepancy you are reffering to could be partly responsable for the huge SNR differnce, but in the past I had many JT9 QSO's over a similar distance (+/- 1500km).


73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T



Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens DK7FC <[email protected]>
Verzonden: woensdag 22 maart 2017 11:00
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF
 
Hm, i remember from my LF days that people tend to say i have "no ears" when i didn't copy them. They copied me very good and so their easy conclusion was that obviously i do not receive well. Actually the discrepancy between the SNR had another reason.
Maybe this is the same phenomenon here?
Also Luis received LA2XPA last night, as he say.
Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2017-03-21 21:56   LA2XPA   0.475783   -26   0   JP33wi   0.2   EA5DOM-1   IM98xn   2807   195 

But i see it was just a single decode.
So maybe the condx were changing? I don't know. Just a thought.

Maybe it is helpful to run some WSPR Rik, so you can see how the levels behave during the evening, and which SNR can be expected. Then you will find the best time to try...

Good luck.

73, Stefan

PS: I missing MF but have to focus on VLF/ULF for some more time. Can't interrupt the current ongoing carrier transmission..


Am 22.03.2017 10:39, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

​and that would be?


73, Rik



Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens DK7FC <[email protected]>
Verzonden: woensdag 22 maart 2017 10:22
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF
 
...i would have another explanation :-)

73, Stefan

Am 22.03.2017 10:13, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Hello Luis,


maybe your big building is good for transmitting but not so good for receiving due to all the local noise. Setting up a remote RX at a quiet location could do miracles.

In JT9-1 mode signals can be copied down to -26dB and you peaked +1dB, so these was a margin up to 27dB (500 x power !!!).



73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T



Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>
Verzonden: woensdag 22 maart 2017 9:54
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: LF: RE: Ready for JT9 in MF
 
Hi Rik
 
Pity ! Could not receive anybody here. And conditions were not bad at all. I was spotting LA2XPA in WPSR at that time
 
I have been monitoring JT9 for some time now and can recall receiving you and other stations
Unfortunately Eric, ON5TA, got a problem in his PA and is QRP now
 
Anyway the downconverter is online and if there is any other chance we can try QSO
 
73 de Luis
EA5DOM

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>