Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RU6LWZ report |
| From: | "Ed Lesnichy" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:39:05 +0300 |
| In-reply-to: | <000a01c27054$a6839440$2abe01d5@main> |
| Organization: | Ed Lesnichy |
| References: | <000a01c27054$a6839440$2abe01d5@main> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hello Alan! Thursday, October 10, 2002, 3:00:01 PM, you wrote: AM> Hi all, a quick crude calucation from Ed's drawing suggests that the Rrad of AM> the aerial he was using could well have been in the order of 6 to 7 ohms. AM> This would result in an ERP of about 35 to 45 watts with 2.5 amp of aerial AM> current. I think that: Rrad = 1600*(H effective/lamb)^2= 1600*(80...100/2200)^2=2...3 Ohm P = I^2*Rrad=2.5^2*(2...3)=12.5...18.75w ERP but the aerial is close located to a metal mast... but...but... but Poutput=40..50w 73! Ed RU6LA [email protected] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RU6LWZ report, Steve Thompson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: TEX/CAL, hamilton mal |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RU6LWZ report, Steve Thompson |
| Next by Thread: | LF: EARS, hamilton mal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |