To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR 15 tonite |
From: | John Lutz <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:05:02 -0700 (PDT) |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1382324703; bh=pHJL6anHmzm7o+K9RGgJ5A1v1IPRmo9WcDMdJI6iizU=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BnSTMZ8m3vqLe1q0i+t6dxCYTOhi37eRawVygBaaQ4Gredvsc65bcKC5gtkgQ1XC42qnCW9gX6ULte/rkZYtve4lkWPJWBpW4HP+17H9H/mznvjVP5HNREKQ+QpR1nfDmSPpUlqHjW7dEJMheep8jbl2nl0ykp+t5MfAnHsMhFw= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rocketmail.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bv8m3Ki43lDJ3006UXRQD7BSo/GTjQWa2Wt4D6EUiO30Y+XniluXQ3hllcnDS8xnWzja728Wf+/6P7CJsx38Ugw0PO4uPWGEPQymumKa4RZvXPeGAxdM/rwFiVFJVQq3BELNrrMMaKcOAYwvAs7VXeVPJXZE2N129iuBhy3yuaU=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Stefan, Thanks for the quick reply and the encouragement regarding my choice of the IDC-136. It is good to know others are using it with success. It sounds like modifications to the receiver itself aren't really necessary. I have to admit that I'm really surprised by the distances being achieved at 136 KHz. I would have expected that a couple hundred miles would be the upper limit, and that even that far would be pretty infrequent. After looking at the WSPRNet database, I can see that I was very mistaken about that. I see lots of reception reports
from you for G3XKR (940km), R7NT (2234 km), 4X1RF (2850 km), and many other distant stations. I would never have thought this possible! :-) Regarding my antenna, I will initially use a 7.25 meter ground-mounted vertical. Normally, I use it for 30-meter operation. I am in the process of constructing a PA0RDT mini-whip. I understand that "active" antennas of this type are fairly popular of LF/VLF work. Again, thank you for taking time to respond to my email. I hope to be WSPRNet active very soon. 73, John / N9JL On Saturday, October 19, 2013 7:24 PM, Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello John, Good decision! LF is the real challenge and as you can see here, 160m is certainly not "Top Band" ;-) The IDC-136 receiver is used with great results. It is used by YV7MAE, TF3HZ, Edgar J. Twining (SWL, VK7) and many more stations. Stability is fine for WSPR-15. Got a decode by YV7MAE last season over 7800 km distance (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/WSPR15_LF_15022013.png). And BTW the manufactorer of the RX is also member of this reflector :-) I guess the sensitivity and dynamic range is completely sufficient for EN51VM. Proven useful modifications can be done on the RX antenna for most radio stations. A cleaner earth or a better decoupling to the noisy shack for example. What kind of antenna do you inted to connect? 73 and good luck on LF! Stefan/DK7FC Am 19.10.2013 20:20, schrieb John Lutz:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: OPDS ?, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: OP-32 captures, SV8CS-Spiros Chimarios |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR 15 tonite, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR 15 tonite, edgar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |