Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: 630m Band Plan

from [DENNIS EASTERLING] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 630m Band Plan
From: DENNIS EASTERLING <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:17:51 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357233472; bh=+qqY+YchKBCBWSSGHadVFXvEV2USbiVi0GqktxYnLzI=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b9HZAdfmEYF06+Ls4lRN0py5mXnCpRcX/Eyf8eDT0HACauz3mMiJwyLhsPe5DzMHoCdniq5N5vFtq7DhDltfhkmWVG7n36psAQ3sU3HonpBahIAzFH1F9welIicz7WdgZcvtZ41ZGNTaDnNDbBtxyjFJUCOEi1Bdi10XmRhMEkI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yDIadB0EvjSOI8yEawhk0N2sr6xfCwnBz4jC5YLL4PDy/G1052rbNN4c85JV8CC8ZXjvJMfMLSAx0VExKGj6OnR/sNhArDsU8R8ANo54698wBy1D1hZy7Zl8CEziYBY2zmqHzZQD9XNMWJwahlE12F1XnNhA2UZxxH1sject1ek=;
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <1FE273E837AA4D978CBB5A745E34368A@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I think Wolf is right, a nice wide part in the centre and beacons on the high side, but we must remember that some are rockbound at the moment so make due allowance.   HNY everybody and hope for some more DX QSOs.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM

From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2013, 17:07
Subject: Re: LF: 630m Band Plan

Am 03.01.2013 17:42, schrieb Graham:
The  more  one  looks at  this , the  more  sensible  it  becomes  ,  I like the  idea  of  a  wide  band  mixed modes   area   474 usb  ,
 
As without  any  formalities  we  can  see  the  more  primitive   modes  are  congregating  in the  centre  of the  band , assumedly necessary  prevent out of band transmissions due to  vfo  drift  or the  like  ?

Objection ;o) Let those 'primitive' but predominant modes like CW remain at the start of the band.
So they will suffer from the digital / beacon / etc QRM only from one side.
Also keep beacon-like transmission as far away from the QSO / CW segment as possible. You will know what I mean when the first 24/7  / 365 day beacon appears ( I really hope this day never comes).

Just my two Euro-cents of wisdom though ...

Wolf .



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: MF NOW, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:  Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, Graham
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, wolf_dl4yhf
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]