To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? |
From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:53:46 -0700 (PDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1314705226; bh=IOsF7deJMM4ney2R5HvUZrKHZqJR9V91bKM1bYYyfK4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HKFZHsbTDwFMf+Nz+s3Ov99CCjW4gU+bWecYN7TNj7+3F0KW23qpxub6krAVJpZWES5VPRP3scJZfnbXsCZ7z5G4SeBeJcWCTFogRYTneLYD9aGvnCn0cl6k8g81QNOM0xN6gdrrLcFONAnsBJ0bopQsUKWmfhqeBC0mWzjErfY= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vs/AiYEhJ3dciz8I3nfFltkuVikUr5QrVd/XqkezQpE9HUV0R8g79TCoXbDgIrb6PeCzhc76C6j3su0y58YZG/MIKnvGvRhc2YPNrWdtKpW4OaRDDfNdfHPnDlUC7FhcHcHEwWjzQfqPLtzwGvi5t84F8E90XaLyKJjzfGILBBI=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Stefan,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
Yesterday evening a purchased a bunch of 7 x MU400HH ferrites (10mm x 200mm each) on eBay, planning to join them together "in parallel" to form a fatter rod, no idea if it will be a good choice but let's play with this new toy ;-) Meanwhile I'm collecting ideas and hints from the web about construction (shielding, computing/measuring parameters, ect.). Projects are stacking as usual :-)
Best regards
Daniele
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:34 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? Hi Daniele,
I think it is no problem. A narrow band but adjustable antenna is a good choice. Just use a large variable cap, e.g. 2x500 pF. It may be helpful to use switched caps and a smaller variable cap like i did. If you have a high Q antenna, you can then easily fine tune the system. So maybe 5...100 pF +100 pF+180 pf+270 pF+560 pF or so, depending on your L. Yes, very suitable. I have exactly these types in my LF ferrite antenna and got a Q of 480. Q will change over the frequency. So maybe it is even helpful to realise a switched L, for the higher frequencies. 73, Stefan |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPRnet.org?, Tony |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Daniele Tincani |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |