Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB... |
| From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:08:20 -0700 (PDT) |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1313064500; bh=HUlMsNkuCzvDz+r2h5VhfE73OQ39glN6KH+9iN3cRSo=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4PATk0Hadt3CRs3iU7gotlpItqAt+GsnZP6umtkSrjIUanFJpgLAdvvCHHXidpLhtnNeTWOmSnkbHyaG0PgqZFdeqr2KFerfzok/uTItf5MODAbb2fsr4Bnii3bMOAxx2KcjoqCneNMkR2DANr8Rp1EtGS/2zaozzxrIOf+lPpI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fEOj+pgiNaf+zHU1VeH+WFQHJa3yjsQSrTD+y2J0+azTsqDUCY8uUjZHlf3WHZXmcJCwP4uT928lQdYEuIfwZisNFFP97GC9vLfn/gnkP3hImcbvus40DkjGzPJp2NPVqDOpwKM0JHIOv+5n6Xn9ZB9wrkIjDhdWL5YndQlOj1k=; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <op.vz1omdp2yzqh0k@pc-roelof> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <67A6F7BF45BF4A0193A3DCB53000A283@PcMinto> <008401cc56ce$2f1fb2c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <12C475F3F4C84B818461753F2E8A60A6@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <8D68749D37B94275855FDBA46A3F6C97@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23SzJFi2tGfkN0fSRMi9bCwa_63uWiAZSV3P+dxcKfuSpg@mail.gmail.com> <op.vz1omdp2yzqh0k@pc-roelof> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Hello Roelof,
in fact a comparison, between a battery-powered Mini-Whip with optical feedline and another with "conventional" installation, would probably clarify the subject. One could measure what the coax effects are on antenna performances.
Regards
D.
From: Roelof Bakker <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:26 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB... Hello Andy, The antenna will work with an optical feedline. I can't imagine that fiber optic forms the other half of the dipole. The probe capacitance is rather low, about 3 pF. My guess is that the "counterpoise" is formed by the PCB part, carrying the buffer amplifier. The layout of the PCB art work has some effect on the received signal strength. Using leaded components, the pick up area measures 30 x 40 mm. A PCB with SMD parts will give the same output with an "antenna" measuring 24 x 30 mm. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB..., g4gvw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB..., Roelof Bakker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB..., g4gvw |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB..., Roelof Bakker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |