By coincidence there is an article today on CNN.COM about using intentional
pollution to combat global warming:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/11/16/smog.warming.ap/index.html
--
73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23
FN42hi
http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: [email protected] (Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23)
> This reminds of an article about how certain types of air pollution (light
> coloured soot particles) can mitigate the effects of greenhouse gasses on
> global
> warming. Similarly this article is touting the benefits of polluting the
> electromagneic spectrum!
>
> Non-contact inductive chargers have been around for some time, the General
> Motors EV-1 electric car used one to recharge the battery, most electric
> toothbrushes use one as well.
>
>
> --
> 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23
> FN42hi
> http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
> > Talbot Andrew wrote:
> > > More HF than LF, but I became very annoyed after reading it.
> > > Do these people not understand basic engineering?
> > >
> > > _http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6129460.stm_
> > >
> > > Andy G4JNT
> >
> > Andy, you haven't taken into account the "quest for funding" aspect of the
> > problem...
> > They probably have devised a way to ask for research funding. Given that
> > the
> > commission that will evaluate that request
> > will be composed by disgruntled and under-payed public officers, they won't
> > understand that it is an hoax, and will
> > grant the fundings. And even if someone of them should have doubts, there
> > are
> no
> > doubts that cannot be dissipated with a
> > check... And the citizens will be happy, as their money was rightfully used
> > to
> > bring forward the state of the knowledge
> > of the human race,,,
> >
> > 73 Alberto I2PHD
> >
>
>
|
