Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: T/A May 14

To: <rsgb[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: T/A May 14
From: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:16:14 +1200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Disregard the comment about signal strength variation with height, Roelof - I must have had a bad night last night! Of course it will vary with height, regardless of feedline issues - silly me!
Interested to hear about the BFR96 though.

Surprised no one jumped on me about the height thing - you lot must all be asleep - or maybe just waking up!! (except ZL4OL)
Dave, ZL3FJ

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:01 AM
Subject: LF: Re: T/A May 14

Hi Roelof
Can you be quite sure the feedline is not contributing to your received signal level? Any variation in strength with height would be a good indication that it is. Interesting to note your proposed use of the BFR96- have to say 2N5109s are not easy to find now. Is the BFR96 used in this instance from the SMD aspect and is there any performance degradation from this.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:38 AM
Subject: LF: T/A May 14

Hello all,

I have designed a new PCB for the mini-whip with SMD parts, except for the
The latter will be exchanged for a BFR96 in the near future.

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 14/05/2006

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>