To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz |
From: | "hvanesce" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 9 Mar 2014 05:16:31 -0700 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass (test mode) [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1394367417; bh=/2PoJvRsf6b30pKGIst39mPCHwHc7eUk2pb8gyM1Pec=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=tjUg+3n367cPJ7FY7mGEN/WIiWCbPtoFe9gDYNpwusDWXZqSSfKCpNsUVaIzi8xfK kSDZ/Rhb3FoGMrv9d2WMHa5V8/VW3no4N673v92fqMb+m4+/WVTxz5Pss4li+dT2aB IycMiewk8JqagV0w6JtWdTjkUPxtxc4ELpX6C3UYflRrlgUrehrAAgW9j8r6LF8Egv oYD52KMrtOd3kOOSst4jgX6wd0+Nb97+SSBSKuGjJweBFDFv518vO9Av8WXr5Q9BR4 8Diejovj3RLPgGVbw6jU2r4L5Nvb/hWhzyeOYxO+bzHvlY03bb1NX/CHV2rRoTmf3B ADhH5eNR6TQ6g== |
In-reply-to: | <DE8A8147B8F04C9CBD67229BD1157A4B@Clemens0811> |
References: | <[email protected]> <2662DF5AA7FA416CBB09CDB90BBFF7B1@White> <[email protected]>,<FA723BF050144798AD076EB0C9190D21@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<A47BA5540C3B42619C724008CDF3A0ED@White> <[email protected]> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <[email protected]> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <DE8A8147B8F04C9CBD67229BD1157A4B@Clemens0811> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AQFwHFQtNP1cuGk4XhlGVCAC9znl2gG7rsFSAR0lnQgBd+LZewJLh/X8Ab8nTT4C/5bZTAGUATieAUzcPSMBZtiUawDaWzx3AoAxwksBwVpScwI72uscAimolEcBOx9H9AFvOCeiAkNoEzYCaGo2mQKz9UH9ARpCXyABdOBMOJpo/vZw |
Clemens, Not necessarily; two possibilities come immediately to mind: trapped surface wave and a change in the modal interference pattern (from phase changes due to ice and/or frozen soil, a change in ionospheric height, or a quantitative change in polarization processes). My thoughts on this topic come mainly from the literature, so I could be missing important pieces. On the other hand I found nothing in Watt's book, AGARD, Wait, Thomson or others on the side of substantially lower VLF losses in winter, just higher. I will keep an eye open for other examples of stronger signals in winter, and it will be a pleasure to learn the mechanisms of each of them. I'll begin by trying LWPC (with appreciation to Paul) on the path that you described; and I will pass along any findings of interest. Thank you for the example. 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Clemens Paul Sent: Sunday, March 9, 2014 4:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz Jim, I use to receive SAQ from Grimeton on 17,2kHz here in southern Germany in winter always significantly stronger (I really mean signal strength, not SNR) than in summer. Distance is a bit less than 1Mm, path is virtually completely over land. Is this a contradiction to the material you've presented in your posting? 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of hvanesce >Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 9:37 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz |
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz, hvanesce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz, hvanesce |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz, Clemens Paul |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz, hvanesce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |