Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Tree current

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Tree current
From: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:54:30 +1200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <000901c7aa26$ecfaff60$82147ad5@w4o8m9> <000d01c7aa8c$6d692860$7c0d7ad5@w4o8m9> <[email protected]> <001301c7acd6$14f492e0$15337ad5@w4o8m9>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Very interesting experiment, Jim.
Did you try checking the coil output with it positioned alnogside one of the trees, as opposed to actually wrapped around it?(i.e. wrapped round an imaginary tree trunk right next to the real one) I used Rogowski coils quite a lot, back when I was routinely measuring longitudinal noise currents in multi-core cables and cable sheaths etc-very useful devices. We made ours up using some special coaxial delay line cable we got in from the USA. It was rather expensive stuff back then. They (Rogowski coils) are readily available commercially these days, so it's easier to go out and just buy one. Good to hear you did the homebrew thing successfully though. It certainly would have been cheaper than buying one!
73
Dave, ZL3FJ



----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:43 PM
Subject: LF: Tree current


Dear LF Group,

It has often been said that trees surrounding an LF vertical antenna can be responsible for a substantial proportion of the antenna loss, and at my QTH there are several trees that have gradually been getting bigger over the years, so I decided to try to measure how much RF current was actually
flowing in some trees.

To measure the tree current, I used a Rogowski coil - this is like a
toroidal RF current transformer, but without the magnetic core; instead of
measuring the secondary current, the open-circuit voltage across the
secondary is measured, and is proportional to the total current flowing through the area enclosed by the coil, the number of turns, the area of each turn, and the frequency. My Rogowski coil used 1.2m of rubber hose as a former, with about 500 turns of insulated wire, and had a scale factor of around 100mV out = 1A in. I measured the voltage with a SPM-3 selective voltmeter. The advantage of this type of current sensor is that the loop of flexible hose former can be made large enough to fit round a tree, and can be opened out, wrapped round the tree to be measured, and closed up again. A practical difficulty is that the output is quite small compared to a normal current transformer, and an aluminium foil electrostatic shield had to be added in order to reduce the effect of pick-up of the intense E-field directly under the antenna. This did not entirely eliminate the problem, but
reduced it to a reasonable level.

I measured the current near ground level in the trunks of 8 trees - these are scattered around within about 10m horizontally of the antenna, with heights of about 5 - 10m (antenna height is around 9 - 11m). With an antenna current around 4A, the currents ranged from 50mA to 190mA, with the total for the 8 trees being 930mA. Generally, trees closer to the antenna and with
bigger areas of foliage had higher currents, as you would expect.

The 8 measured are only a sample of the small trees and large bushes in and around my garden, also at about 20 - 40m distance there are larger trees all around my QTH as well. So it seems likely that a large fraction of the electric flux of the antenna is intercepted by a tree at some point, and a substantial proportion of the total antenna current is flowing to ground through trees. Since wood is a poor conductor, it is not surprising that trees close to the antenna increase the loss resistance. But also, current flowing vertically in the trees will contribute to the overall radiation of the antenna. However, since a current flowing "up" the antenna will be flowing "down" the tree, and the spacing of tree and antenna is a very small fraction of a wavelength, the effect of the tree current will be to partly cancel the overall radiation, and so reduce the radiation resistance. If the current flowing in the trees is a large fraction of the total antenna current, and the height of the trees is comparable with the antenna height,
one could expect a substantial reduction in radiation resistance and
effective height of the antenna, as the field strength measurements I made
last week would seem to indicate.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/843 - Release Date: 10/06/2007 13:39



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>