MF propagation also good tonite. Could FR5ZX listen on the QRSS FREQ
476.2 plus/minus.
We could all TX around that freq . Not everyone has WSPR etc but MOST can
TX on QRSS say QRSS 10
Hi
Fausto,
Normal CW would have been possible last night! There were 90
decodes by FR5ZX last night. The best reports from last night are:
| Timestamp |
Call |
MHz |
SNR |
Drift |
Grid |
Pwr |
Reporter |
RGrid |
km |
az |
| 2015-10-31 22:30 |
PA0A |
0.475725 |
-20 |
0 |
JO33de |
2 |
FR5ZX |
LG78pu |
9511 |
135 |
| 2015-10-31 23:46 |
DK7FC |
0.475684 |
-12 |
0 |
JN49ik |
1 |
FR5ZX |
LG78pu |
9095 |
137 |
| 2015-11-01 00:12 |
DF6NM |
0.475785 |
-20 |
0 |
JN59nj |
1 |
FR5ZX |
LG78pu |
8974 |
139 |
| 2015-10-31 23:58 |
DJ0ABR |
0.475665 |
-25 |
0 |
JN68nt |
0.2 |
FR5ZX |
LG78pu |
8830 |
140 |
| 2015-10-31 23:42 |
DH5RAE |
0.475753 |
-27 |
0 |
JN68qv |
0.5 |
FR5ZX |
LG78pu |
8826 |
141 |
| 2015-10-31 23:12 |
IZ7SLZ |
0.475777 |
-27 |
0 |
JN80nu |
0.01 |
FR5ZX |
LG78pu |
7941 |
143 |
You know, a few weeks back
i've tested the readability of a signal at -6 dB and -16 dB. -6 dB was fine for
a normal speed (100 Bpm) CW QSO. -16 dB was barely audible, not fine for a QSO,
maybe a call can be copied when repeated a few times. So i think that -12 dB
should be fine for a QSO at 60 Bpm and some concentration... But it was just a
short moment within 4 hours. Not sure if someone want to call CQ for such a long
time to make a "599tu" QSO then :-)
73, Stefan
PS: Could someone
provide more statistical overview of last nights results?
Am
01.11.2015 12:09, schrieb Fausto Coletti:
Hi Stefan,
-14 dB !!!
Virtually with 10 dB extra power you
would get an audible CW signal...at 9000 Km WOW.
73, Fausto
IK4NMF
