Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 16:46:16 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1394379979; bh=unxqpvneHEmIFwrF1JM7lLVEALdCtX//qoinnk2mfVw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FfpdhA8O1x48Bs1yhphmreXud+S1z9duJRMMPSbu5yqAqY50fhgGLClTAW9u3q4su h8wJOWso6Oh0sLhcPOmbhZaoJgpnPCz4qzHZgMCWp6/xuSVQ1PNT79DgNHEBH9ZNww mNhFu5kPfFhELbGI86BUTnbUK8bUS6/esdMbJpHw=
Importance: Normal
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<FA723BF050144798AD076EB0C9190D21@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<A47BA5540C3B42619C724008CDF3A0ED@White> <[email protected]> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <[email protected]> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <76F90E9771CA44F3981F679241E1A005@White> <[email protected]> <008b01cf3bac$c9568ce0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Jay, are these plots based on measurement or simulation? 73, Markus

Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz

While not VLF, WWVB at 60 kHz shows no significant difference in signal level at various receiving locations summer vs. winter.
 
 
As expected though, SNR is better in winter.
 
 
Hard to believe things would be vastly different at 30 kHz ... but suppose anything is possible.    
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2  WG2XRS/2
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>