Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Fw: 5 MHZ NOV RENEWAL

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: 5 MHZ NOV RENEWAL
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:28:52 -0000
References: <010001cddec5$42b69d00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
John
If they do this will be the SHORTEST NOV EVER. I would be inclined to let it
run for the value of a few days.
or as it stated this morning START 20th December 2012
mal/g3kev

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Pumford-Green" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: 5 MHZ NOV RENEWAL


> On 20/12/2012 15:18, mal hamilton wrote:
> > MF for info I just renewed my 5 Mhz NOV for additional frequencies
> > and it states clearly that the NOV ISSUE IS 1st January 2013 and
> > expiry 1st January 2018. This makes it clear that any alterations to
> > additional frequencies will not commence until the 1st January 2013.
> > whereas the 472 NOV clearly states NOV ISSUE is 20th December 2012
> > until 20th December 2017 it could not be any clearer.
>
> Hello Mal, LF,
>
> That's just because you applied for your 5MHz NoV AFTER the RSGB fixed
> their NoV issuing machine to change the date to the (correct) one of 1
> Jan 2013.
>
> Both of my new NoVs, for 5MHz and 472kHz state the same : 20 December
> 2012, because I applied before they "fixed" their error.
>
> I imagine people applying for a 473kHz NoV later in the day will find
> it's dated January 1 2013 as well.
>
> You seem to have managed to get one wrongly dated one (the MFpne) and
> one correctly dated one (5MHz).
>
> The question now is, will they send out correctly dated ones to all
> those people whove been given incorrect notices?
>
> John
> GM4SLV
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>