To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: OT: Headphones |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:05 -0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1327712219; bh=aFz7c6CVcD5zJFPBVEYlTWsCEe7pezBc/AWGA9iM6pA=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=PBEA4moUAyvVskpI8oRlU6oV8iO7CPkyK5lSXhSCJ8zOxiJYluaeWLrpg5NKA5qoDouRETuWE2aNt2Wc9guWxtB4AH5RRjYfoWZHVDGJj1xmojZgSbhjSG96uqqjA/b19a0CewyRTVMMHCzuzcfPE6+nuKxoxN8PLV2UVi7GYgM= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=twOosnw+JoE4VJkhaP9WSdrF1OIvt8n1rtPfe4plWCmTQ6k8abtnVF70bCsxYBIu73Qcb/b0z7zTbn+N32fg/IRt+ILcTrVZvBXRX6mM3PM/uj+NP3qEd9bYnySyuICKRqgUHViFPwsUyz+oJVQ3Kg6HC2lxJW/i8lX2Z7hMAk0= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <CAHAQVWP_9KdqZ1NjzmJqB3O2mrb-GfJfZBf_D7CY0Y8FAasC3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Roger, you are talking about kit from the good ol' days when things had to be made sensitive :-)) I think those uints have a quite high impedance (5 to 10k??) a fairly narrow range cetainly no more than telephone bandwidth, and I believe some were even tuned to favour morse tone frequencies. I think I have heard of ops loading the diaphram to peake them lower in frequency. Most if not all modern headphones are made for "HiFi" and use small low impedance speakers in the muffs. It might be possible to make a sensitive one by swapping these for piezo units like used in singing birthday cards :-)) They are obviously very high impedance, but most seem to be driven from single batteries, and do not have the aid of the muffs to channel the sound.......Just a though for someone who wants to experiment :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Lapthorn" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:29 PM Subject: LF: OT: Headphones > Slightly OT but people like Mal and Jim may have an answer. > > Is there a "modern" (i.e. can you buy it new today?) headphone set that is * > extremely* sensitive in the same way that the old DLR5 headsets were in > terms of efficiency converting AF to sound pressure in the ear? > > I believe Jim M0BMU claimed 2uV audio power could be heard using DLR5 > headsets in his passive mechanical SAQ receiver. As DLR5s are more > difficult to find these days I was wondering if there is anything as > sensitive, or more so, around "new". > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > -- > http://qss2.blogspot.com/ > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: OT: Headphones, John Bruce McCreath |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: WOLF: 135975 Hz, 10 b/s again, John Bruce McCreath |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: OT: Headphones, John Bruce McCreath |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: OT: Headphones, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |