----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010
5:28 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS SPEED
Mal
What do you know... Answer, nothing useful to
this discussion.
You have no experience using long dot lengths or
paths outside the small confines of EU on LF where it's easy to preach
your BS as it only works because of the density of stations...
Also
your preaching about much power and huge vertical antennas is not
relevant. Once you reach a certain point say the 1W ERP limit we are
all equal. So the only multipliers left is integration and operator
practice using long integration technologies.
Alas, this is what
burns you up as you have no skill in these areas and when you try you end
up working the neighbour's toaster oven as your comical attempt to copy
Stefan on 9KHz demonstrated...
It's too bad you're the type of dog
that can't be taught new tricks...
So rather than waste BW on the
reflector spend some time TRYING to work some real DX at say the 12000km
or 7100km range and then post some meaningful comments. You'll find
that your worn bag of tricks won't work.
73
Scott
On 12/1/2010 3:14 PM, mal
hamilton wrote:
LF/MF
Like I have said many times before. QRS
speeds of 3 or 10 are usually sufficient and maybe 30 in extreme cases
but speeds of 120, 240 and slower are not useful because of QSB and QRM
hits breaking up the trace and producing misleading
results.
in fact even faster CW is useful for an ID
under poor or bad fading conditions.
Use as much power as possible and a good
elevated antenna to overcome path fading and qrm. QRP signals
are vy prone to QSB whereas the QRO signals make it to DX
destinations.
Grabbers running at vy slow speeds are not
useful
de mal/g3kev