To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: QRSS120 and grabbers |
From: | "rn3agc" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:59:05 +0300 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Subject:References:To:From:Message-ID; bh=E6aezCMN7VIc8yXkzzCgoD9AtscUrwi5Fjfgk3Fsytw=; b=f63UpLvP05S/oH9kNdakywQa4fgcG9bDnTi1/6N9kv4cC7c2nZCvaNPGv4drkMfE5/Nx3oTd+xLHu8d0/ZuXEEvotDLxhhOMIR2dF4el89yURliV0oUDXLdBtR4761ME; |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <005001cb917a$15cb1720$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello LF'ers, My modest opinion - isn't present sense to do grabbers with a speed more 60s/dot. Concerning superlong modes... Definitely, in it there is a sense. When the signal level so weak that it is commensurate with the level of noise, a long "strips" can be identified! 73Andrey |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: QRSS120 and grabbers, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: xgj,agc, rn3agc |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: QRSS120 and grabbers, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: T/A [137kHz] Grabber are not noisy !, "Jean-Pierre Méré (F1AFJ)" |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |