Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: ROS

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: ROS
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:33:11 +0100
References: <001201cc6943$47f18e40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><008e01cc6994$8c75fa00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <CAJStiw7VGJ9Zm9pjusMdwRX1iBhaZixYzMnSgq_sX7TJMjSkWA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I understand, but I was not.  Considering the volume of signals visible at my QTH, but I did copy one complete line from the GM station, who was probably the weakest, also as pointed out I kept getting via the internet other freqs and acty that I did not want.
The prog also crashed 3 times, not the PC. It does not look attractive. I was able to see all the signals active on the waterfall and had it been qrs 3 I could have copied all of the information instead of waiting and waiting and nothing happened
Others are are also critical about this mode on LF es MF
Why did I copy one station and not the others especially the strong ones ?
mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

Mal,

Did you mis-understand ?

I was getting 100% decodes from Finbar & John even though there was no audible or visual signal.

Cheers, Gary - G4WGT.


On 2 September 2011 18:20, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
You have just verified what I have always said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in the end all will come to the same conclusion as Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude of private emails saying the same thing. We are not alone !!
de g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
While it is interesting to experiment with different modes
Mal is this really you?

I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW comment!



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>