To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: J310 IMD figures |
From: | "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:00:28 +0100 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:01:20 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
References: | <000701c62720$be51b3a0$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <000901c627ec$a44d91f0$2201a8c0@pcroelof> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello André, Thank you for the Antenna and Propagation Manual link. In our case we chose 300 Hz << I assume this should be 300 kHz. Yes, I agree that IMD-measurements can be tricky. For IP2 I often found level differences for the IMD products F1 + F2 and F1 - F2. In this specific case, a different value for the 12 pF capacitor, leads to different results. For that reason, I tried the real thing by using BCB stations as signal generators. However, there are no nearby very strong BCB stations here. I will have to drive 200 km to get close to a Dutch MW transmitter site. Best regards, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Keeping the smoke in, Alan Melia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: TA 3 JAN 06, Jay Rusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: J310 IMD figures, Andre Kesteloot |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: J310 IMD figures, Andre Kesteloot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |