Paul
Whiskers but no CAT at this QTH.
At least the Antenna discussion is now more civilised and humourous apart
from Jim Boy and his personal insults and not relevant to the topic
discussed.
mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reeves Paul" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: LF: Antennas
> Don't forget, Mal still uses cats whiskers and coherers - that's why he
> needs large antennas and keeps on asking everyone to use QRO amplifiers
and
> antennas that need 2 acres of ground space because he cannot hear them :-)
> But more seriously, I rather agree with Andy, unless you need fancy
> directional processing for the rx side you only need to be external noise
> limited - all the naval systems (that I've dealt with...) use active rx
> antennas and serious multicouplers. Tx uses as much metalwork as they can
> get up there, generally whips. Subs also use active antenna probes and
loops
> for vlf (rather a critical area you might think....) - rather less
> interested in transmitting though:-)
> But it would be nice to have the space and low noise level that Mal seems
to
> have........
>
> Paul G8GJA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 03 January 2012 15:02
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: Antennas
>
> What commercial two way LF stations still exist? All that I know of just
> transmit. Way back when there was two way LF traffic a high level receive
> signal was needed for the cat whisker detector to work :)
>
> Dex
>
> This email, including any attachment, is a confidential communication
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed. It contains information which is private and may be proprietary
> or covered by legal professional privilege. If you have received this
email
> in error, please notify the sender upon receipt, and immediately delete it
> from your system.
>
> Anything contained in this email that is not connected with the businesses
> of this company is neither endorsed by nor is the liability of this
company.
>
> Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that any attachment
to
> this email has been swept for viruses, we cannot accept liability for any
> damage sustained as a result of software viruses, and would advise that
you
> carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
>
>
|
