LF: wspr

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

To:	"rsgb" <[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: wspr
From:	"mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:50:47 -0000
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

If recent published info is correct, this specifies a bandwidth of 6hz why is USB with a bandwidth of 3 khz necessary to receive this transmission.

Surely it would be obvious that CW mode was more appropriate where one could use a narrow filter and dsp processor of a few hertz.

I have asked this question before but never got an answer.

g3kev

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: wspr, mal hamilton <= Re: LF: wspr Narrow Bandwidth, Andy - KU4XR Re: LF: wspr, Scott Tilley Re: LF: wspr, mal hamilton Re: LF: wspr, Mark Re: LF: wspr, mal hamilton Why WSPR when you can SHOUT! was Re: LF: wspr, Scott Tilley Re: Why WSPR when you can SHOUT! was Re: LF: wspr, mal hamilton Re: Why WSPR when you can SHOUT! was Re: LF: wspr, Andy Talbot LF: Re: Why WSPR when you can SHOUT!, Scott Tilley LF: Re: Re: Why WSPR when you can SHOUT!, mal hamilton

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon, mal hamilton
Next by Date:	LF: Re: WSPR, James Moritz
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon, riese-k3djc
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: wspr Narrow Bandwidth, Andy - KU4XR
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]